Of course, if we are being REALLY pedantic, the FBI would not have sent the defendant an invoice. They would have issued a purchase order.
Hat Tip: Language Log
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Woolly Thinking Expunged!
The Harsh Spotlight of Ridicule Shone upon Moral Equivalence!
Algarve Golf
Blogroll
- 419 er Watch
- Celebblog
- Tim Worstall
- Disclosure Policy
- Wibble
- Winnie
- Sober
- Be
- I Shall
- Morning
- By
- But
- Yes
- Or
- Welcome
- Be
- Would
- Behalf
- Your
- On
- Silence
- Of
- Period
- A
- Laski
- Harold
- To
- Atlee
- For
- Except
- Maybe
- Well
- Ever
- Insult
- Political
- Best
- By
- Savaged
- Sheep
- Dead
- Dennis
- Healey
- Billy
- Silly
- I wouldn't
- rubbish
- Things Creationist Hate
- The Idiots Guide to Logical Fallacies
- My Manifesto
- Offensive Spirit
Sitemeter
Labels
- amy winehouse (1)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(111)
-
▼
October
(15)
- Complete Delusion on ID Cards
- Integrity...
- Pride comes before a fall
- Happy Trafalgar Day!
- A Test Case!
- I fought the law...
- An Explanation for our American Cousins
- The Inexorable March of the Quiche Eaters
- A Prediction
- Brit blog Roundup
- Offensive Spirit
- Things Creationists Hate
- Guilty as Charged
- United in Divisiveness, or something.
- Tigged again
-
▼
October
(15)
5 comments:
Hmmm... this is interesting.
Your case is possibly a trifle thread-bare here.
More correctly, I suspect that our man ought to be saying "If they wanted a dog in order to sniff for explosives...", as it is a specific purpose rather than merely a qualifier, but that would have opened up the possibility of a split infinitive in the first frame, thereby spoiling the timing element of the comic effect...
;-)
Or he could have said, "a dog that sniffs for explosives," thereby removing the insinuation that the dog is some sort of death seeking thrill junkie and not a responsible agent of the law.
PGiO: nah, one doesn't need "in order". Just "to sniff for" suffices.. Or what about the old army style: you know - Balls, pong-ping, officers for the use of?
Why do I think that the defendant is definitely going to be hanged...?
DK
Because he is giltridden all over his face and deserves hanging, with some nice drawing by Al Hirschfeld indicative of his early style and some quartering as well.
Post a Comment